Can I Shoot a Police Officer in Self Defense

On March 18, 2018, in Sacramento, Stephon Clark was shot and killed by police officers who thought he was holding a gun and aiming information technology at them.

At least, that'due south what the police force officers say they saw. One also thought he saw a muzzle flash from the gun, indicating Clark was already shooting at them. The other officer only thought he saw light reflected off the metallic of the gun.

As information technology turned out, Clark was simply property a cellphone. Light could accept reflected off the phone, or Clark could have been taking a photo of the officers (as people who recall the police are harassing them oft do) and they saw the wink.

It was dark and the police are taught to shoot first when they believe their lives, or the lives of their fellow officers, are in danger. They at least thought they were pursuing a trigger-happy felon who had already cleaved several car windows and a sliding drinking glass door on a dwelling.

In whatsoever case, the police were not charged with a crime. So, is shooting someone because you remember they are pointing a gun at you legal?

What if that someone is a police officeholder? If someone breaks into your domicile without warning, is it legal to shoot that person if you don't know he  or she is a constabulary officer?

What if Stephon Clark had been holding a gun? If he had shot them preemptively because he idea they would shoot him on sight when they saw he had a gun, would he accept been justified? What if the constabulary had broken into Clark's abode?

Would he take been acquitted? Should he?

The police is one thing, reality another. While there is some legal theory that a using lethal force in defence force of a abode would accept been justified, the courts and the police tend to overlook the errors of police enforcement more generously than those of the full general citizenry.

Hither are a few examples, all involving no-knock warrants looking for armed and unsafe drug dealers but which constitute nothing to justify police action:

• On Dec. 19, 2013, Texan Henry Goedrich Magee shot and killed an officer entering his home with a no-knock warrant. He said he thought he was being burglarized and the 1000 jury decided that was a reasonable assumption. They decided against indicting him, on the shooting, anyway, though Magee did spend 18 months in jail on a marijuana accuse.
• On the other manus, in a similar example, Marvin Guy of Texas is however awaiting trial more than 4 years after a no-knock raid resulted in an officer's expiry.
• Cory Maye of Mississippi spent 10 years on death row for killing a police officeholder during a drug raid on his dwelling before a plea deal reduced the charge to manslaughter and fourth dimension served in 2014. Maye had claimed he was defending his young girl against what he believed was an assail on his abode.
• Ray Rosas – who wasn't even the target of the raid and didn't impale the police officers he shot – spent two years in jail, mostly in solitary confinement, awaiting trial before he was acquitted. His elderly female parent was removed from his care and he lost his family abode.

So, yes, sometimes you tin can shoot a police officeholder in self-defense – at least if information technology's a no-knock raid and you don't know the intruder is a police officeholder – merely that doesn't hateful you volition get off scot-free.

Stephon Clark's example wasn't a no-knock situation. He was out in the open. However, he didn't have the gun police thought he did. There were other factors, withal, that may take led to the officers not facing charges.

Clark was acting peculiarly.

What the officers couldn't have known at the time is that Stephon Clark had multiple drugs in his organization – alcohol, marijuana, opioids, benzodiazepine, and an over-the-counter allergy medicine – and his blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was 0.091, higher than the 0.08 drunk driving standard.

Some have suggested he was committing suicide by cop. At a press conference, Sacramento district attorney Anne Marie Schubert implied that Clark was suicidal. At the very least, he may have been depressed. Evidence included:

• His browser search history revealed he was looking up ways to commit suicide with drugs;
• His girlfriend/fiancé said he struck her and now was threatening him with jail for violating parole;
• A text he sent to his girlfriend showed a photograph of a scattering of pills (Xanax), with the message, "Let'southward fix our family unit or I'm taking all of these."

But, as has been pointed out past some commentators, we don't know if the police had any drugs in their system or their mental state. There's no indication that their blood was tested for drugs, or that their phones or browsing histories were checked for incriminating evidence.

And they should be. Police officers are two or 3 times more likely to abuse drugs than the population as a whole.

A quarter of constabulary officers are estimated to have alcohol or drug corruption problems. We should be doing more than to help them into habit rehab before their self-medication leads to avoidable civilian or police deaths, and that starts with cognition.

Aside from the risks associated with performing their duties, at that place is the risk of suicide. Co-ordinate to Blueish Assist, in 2022 more police officers took their own lives than were lost in the line of duty for at least the third year in a row.

Another police officer involved in a shooting was Bister Guyger, who was off-duty when she shot and killed Botham Jean in his own apartment, Sept. 6, 2018, in Dallas. In a fashion, this was a no-knock situation, merely no warrant or raid was involved.

Guyger had just gotten off a fourteen- or 15- 60 minutes shift (she wanted the overtime) when she attempted to enter Jean's apartment, which was ane floor above her own. She claims she thought it was her flat and that Jean was an intruder. She also says she was tired – understandable after a long shift. Just other aspects of her story accept changed:

• Guyger at beginning said the apartment door was closed, then afterwards she claimed it had been open up a petty, ajar at to the lowest degree. Neighbors have said that the apartment doors close automatically, so it couldn't have been ajar.
• Guyger says she put her cardinal in the lock, pushed, and the door opened. Lawyers for Jean'southward family claim they accept a witness who heard her pounding on the door enervating to be let in.
• Guyger claims she thought it was her apartment, but when she chosen 911 she had to bank check the apartment door to give them the number. (If she had but realized she was in the wrong apartment, this would exist understandable.)

Guyger has been indicted and was fired past the Dallas Police Department. The trial is set to begin in September 2019.

That Guyger was off-duty at the time of the shooting may explain why her treatment differed from that of Stephon Clark'south shooters. Constabulary Chief Renee Hall said at a press briefing that "we have ceased handling it under our normal officeholder-involved shooting protocol."

Even then, she is receiving much better treatment than civilians who shoot police officers. Guyger at to the lowest degree is out on bail.

Although Guyger's blood was drawn for a toxicology written report, the tests either oasis't been completed or have not been released more nine months later. Stephon Clark'southward toxicology report was revealed subsequently less than half dozen weeks. It would be cynical to suggest that if Guyger's report was make clean, it would have been released already.

Some of Guyger's beliefs suggests possible intoxication, mental confusion or poor judgment. She might fifty-fifty be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (she shot a suspect in 2017).

Allegedly, Guyger had complained about noise from Jean'southward flat before. Perchance she went there to say she needed some sleep and to please keep the dissonance to a minimum, and it escalated. Maybe she held a grudge and was in a bad mood. (Her Pinterest account was said to include violent humbug.)

Constabulary have a unsafe and stressful job. It's a chore that most citizens know needs doing. That doesn't excuse police officers who corruption their potency or are reckless or devil-may-care.

It doesn't excuse institutional racism either. It may merely be circumstantial, but with the exception of Magee, all the civilians in these cases are persons of colour.

Finally, it doesn't excuse then violent and fallible a technique as no-knock raids. There are more than than 20,000 no-knock raids every twelvemonth – as many every bit 50,000 in 2004 – but only about 25 percent plough up the suspected drugs.

The New York Times' own inventory found no-knock raids resulted in an increase in officer deaths (eight instead of v) while civilian deaths decreased (31 instead of 47) over knock-and-announce.

Stephen Bitsoli

The U.S. Constitution made the right to bear arms a guaranteed right second only to liberty of speech.

Police shouldn't give the constabulary-abiding citizens they are sworn to protect cause to exercise this right against them.

Stephen Bitsoli, a Michigan-based freelancer, writes nearly addiction treatment , politics, history, and related matters for several blogs. He welcomes comments from readers.

hodgeslareattand.blogspot.com

Source: https://thecrimereport.org/2019/06/10/is-there-a-right-of-self-defense-against-police/

Share this post